Shopping for water purification equipment can be confusing. Consumers need a little help if they are to make the right choices neogen indonesia. The good news is, there is some help out there.
The industry is largely unregulated, but a few states have standing laws that require manufacturers to back up their claims with facts. Surprisingly, some of the most highly advertised systems do not provide the facts that back up their claims.
They make general statements, rather than specific ones. For example, they may say that their water purification equipment removes or reduces chlorine, without specifying the percentage of reduction.
The best companies have independent testing conducted by laboratories like Underwriters. Those are the systems that you can trust. But, what else is in your water?
Most of the systems on the market are designed to remove chlorine, because the taste and odor are a big problem for a large number of people. Chlorine is easily removed with granular carbon. Systems that include a second step, a carbon and multi-media block, further reduce chlorine and other chemicals.
If it is properly designed, that second step can also remove illness-causing cysts. They may or may thermogravimetric analyzer tga not be a problem in your area. There levels are typically higher in the spring and summer months. They are protozoa in an early stage of development that are resistant to practically all disinfection methods.
They can either be filtered out or boiling will kill them. Unless you want to boil everything that you drink, the best option is to filter them out.
Even very inexpensive faucet filters will remove cysts. There is no reason to risk exposure to them. But, if you don't fully evaluate your water purification equipment before you buy, you might end up with a simple chlorine filter.
Recently, there was a popular product being sold on HSN. It was advertised as a purifier. The company said that it was "maintenance free". Advertising claims are often misleading.
After complete evaluation, it was revealed that the system was a simple carbon filtration device that only reduced chlorine and odors. There were no steps to reduce cysts, lead or other common contaminants.
The biggest rip-off though, in my opinion, is a system that reduces chlorine, without reducing chlorination byproducts. It is obvious that chlorination byproducts would be present, yet the average water purification equipment does not reduce them at all.
According to the latest studies, exposure to those byproducts doubles our risk of bladder cancer. We might not be able to taste them or smell them, but they are hazardous, nonetheless. If you get a consumer confidence report, they are listed as TTHMs or total trihalomethanes.
Comments